logo

NORAD Was Blind During Y2k Vigil -- Satellite Redundancy Wasn´t There


Latest News Stories:

cover-eletronicprivacy

Only $31.95

New Methodology:

shun

Product Reviews

OSAll is starting to do weekly product reviews, to be published every single Friday.  Check out software, book and hardware reviews.

 Check it out!

Front | Methods | BBS | FAQ | Adverts | Mail | Write | Link | Shop

"Y2k, all hype, all the time."

Kevin Mitnick Appeals to Supreme Court

JIP
OSAll Staff

Kevin Mitnick´s attorneys have filed a petition for writ of certiorari.  This petition, presented to the Supreme Court, asks that the stipulation that Mitnick not use any cellular or computer devices for three years violates his First Amendment rights.  It also asks whether the stipulation that he be employed, combined with the stipulation he not use computers, ensures he will stay in prison.

On May 20, 1998, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals denied the petition saying that First Amendment rights were not violated.  The writ, however, cites ACLU v. Reno, which states that as the "most participatory form of mass speech yet developed" the Internet is protected by the First Amendment.

The appeals court originally based its conclusion on a case where a motorcycle gang member was prohibited from joining any motorcycle group.

The Supreme Court has the option of whether to entertain the petition or not.  If the petition is entertained Mitnick´s lawyers will go in front of the Supreme Court to plead their case.

The entire text of the petition can be found on OSAll.

Related Links:

 

 

Don´t forget to discuss this issue on the OSAll BBSystem!

All content copyright 1998 - 99 unless book covers or otherwise noted.  Book covers copyright 1998 - 99 Amazon.com.  All OSAll-owned content may be reprinted with the following header added: "Copyright 1998 - 99 Owl Services.  Visit aviary-mag.com for computer security news and information."  Article authors retain a non-exclusive right to republish their work.   324