|
Williams Reply
Hi,
[The earlier Harvard] statement is incorrect, and even libelous itself by implying that I had "sexually related materal" on the server. I NEVER did!
NOW, I will retain legal counsel. This is outrageous!
I wouldn't have been surprised to find myself slandered by John Vranesevich and AntiOnline, but to have Harvard implicitly state that I was serving up "sexually related material" to the Internet is absurd, libelous, and legally reprehensible.
Are you, Harvard, trying to ruin my reputation and career now too?
It sounds to me like you are fabricating this "sexually related material and personal attacks" statement to appease your critics, and, as I (now ominously) mentioned in my first open letter, trying to use me as the fall guy.
Regretfully,
Ken Williams |
